Re: conlang classification and productivity

Hello everyone again.

Well, I belong to several lists, but I must confess that this is the
friendliest welcome I have ever received. I have had some kind words said
about Teran, my conlang and some good challenges lain before me in a few
private emails.

Can someone driect me to what I can read to understand what is being
described in this email? I'd like to be able to participate as well.
Thanks,
Scott Hlad

===============================
Scott W. Hlad
Teran, a Conlang
http://www.teran-conlang.org
mailto:scott@kohath.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On
> Behalf Of Padraic Brown
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 7:33 PM
> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> Subject: Re: conlang classification and productivity
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Christophe Grandsire wrote:
>
> >Well, I know I'm late, but I want to give my ratings too :) :
>
> Better late than never! And before anyone extolls the virtues of
> the early bird, just remember that the second mouse gets the
> cheese.
>
> As for myself (and keeping in mind that this Lagrateck PS scale is
> _very_ relative when compared to a real-world language):
>
> Kerno:  L3 G4.5 T4 C4 P2 S5
> Talarian: L1 G4 T1 C4 P4.5 S4.5
>
> And a host of L1 G1 T1 C1 P0 S0 languages that coinhabit an alternate
> world: Anian, Hoosickite, Pendarvian, Wreynoldian, Hecklan,
> Mentolatian, Angeran, Old Iconian, New Iconian, Yllemese, Watuguar,
> Gurranian, Ladhinat, and Lingua Lucaria. There are undoubtedly others.
>
> Padraic.

Replies