Re: question on sampa representation
| From: | Peter Clark <peter-clark@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, March 24, 2003, 22:33 |
|---|
On Monday 24 March 2003 04:26 pm, John Cowan wrote:
> Joe Fatula scripsit:
> > - put book foot
> > - pull rule ghoul fool
> > - putter pun rough lung judge
>
> This is all copacetic for my dialect, except for "pull", which belongs in
> the "put" set. In the set you have it in, it would be homonymous with
> "pool". X-SAMPAly the three sets are [V], [u], [U].
I hope you mean that the order (read in a descending fashion) is [U], [u],
[V]. Does your dialect contrast [V] and [@], by any chance?
:Peter
--
Oh what a tangled web they weave who try a new word to conceive!
Reply