Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Metrical Stress, Feet, etc.

From:Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...>
Date:Friday, February 6, 2004, 15:36
On Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 05:20  PM, Tristan McLeay wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Pavel Iosad wrote: > >> Is as good an exmple of PM's binarity principle as any, since it >> prohibits words of less than a foot, thus CV words are impossible >> (with >> a few exceptions, such as discourse words, such as Russian _da_ >> 'yes'). >> The minimal word is CVC in a language which doesn't distinguish length >> and CVC or CV: in a length-sensitive language. > > Hm, interesting, I wasn't aware of this. So it's a universal?
Binarity seems to be universal, but I don't think that Pavel is correct in stating that languages without a length distinction have CVC as the minimal word. Many native languages of Australia have no length distinctions and the minimal word seems to be two syllables. Dirk -- Dirk Elzinga Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu "I believe that phonology is superior to music. It is more variable and its pecuniary possibilities are far greater." - Erik Satie