Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources

Right with Dirk there.  My langs may be artlangs for lack of a better
category, but my purpose in creating them was not artistic expression.

As for one-stop shopping for information, there's this thing called Google...


On 2/26/08, Dirk Elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:36 AM, <MorphemeAddict@...> wrote:
>
> > Dirk,
> > One of the reasons I like Wikipedia is that it is all available from the
> > same
> > place and it has search functions.
> > It's one-stop shopping, for good or ill.
>
>
> I agree; I use it frequently as well. I was not trying to malign Wikipedia;
> I'll leave that for others to do. As for constructed languages, I think that
> the solution others have proposed (general article about language
> construction, links to prominent constructed languages) is reasonable.
>
> As for regarding crafts as art, I recognize that people do this as well.
> Perhaps I'm just being stubborn, but I still don't regard my language
> construction activity as art. Others may treat it as such, but not because I
> present it that way.
>
> stevo   </HTML>
> >
>
> Dirk
> --
> Miapimoquitch: Tcf Pt*p+++12,4(c)v(v/c) W* Mf+++h+++t*a2c*g*n4 Sf++++argh
> Lc++d++600
>

--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>