From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, May 29, 2003, 2:14 |
On Wed, 28 May 2003 00:01:26 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@...> wrote:>Joseph Fatula scripsit: > >> A quahog's not a clam??? It sure looks like one. What is it then, >> technically? > >Well, it depends on whether you use "clam" generically for any bivalved >mollusk, or whether you use it narrowly for ... I forget what, but >a clam is a clam, a quahog is a quahog, and a scallop is a scallop.I recognized the quote, and I happen to have my Stephen Jay Gould book collection on the shelf behind me, so I looked it up.... "I well remember the reprimand I received from a New England shipmate when I applied the informal scientific term "clam" to all bivalved mollusks (to him a clam is only the steamer, _Mya arenaria_): "A quahog is a quahog, a clam is a clam, and a scallop is a scallop.""
John Cowan <cowan@...> |