From: | Mefistofeles <mefistofeles@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, March 6, 2001, 18:55 |
Me and some friends (we are studying Chinese together) were discussing the fact that Chinese do not have Tempus. Chinese is one of the oldest and largest of all languages and it's don good with adverb of time. We came to the conclusion that either Chinese would be the perfect auxiliary languages or a constructed language with similarly structure, any comments? (By the way Swedish is my main language, just so you do not think I do not advocate my mother language). /DHS
Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> | |
Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> | |
Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> | |
E-Ching Ng <e-ching.ng@...> |