Re: This is not a conlang.
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 15:46 |
Quoting "Adrian Morgan (aka Flesh-eating Dragon)" <dragon@...>:
> How many conlangers find it easy to produce nonsense syllables that
> mean nothing in any language, real or invented, yet have the
> appearance (e.g. the cadence and phonetical variation) of real
> speech?
I find it tolerably easy, FWIW. Did long before I became a conlanger, unless my
memory is fooling me.
It does tend to CV syllables and a Swedish-like phonetic inventory, tho.
Andreas