Re: Gender classes, which to use?
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, November 25, 1998, 11:48 |
At 07:13 25/11/98 +0000, you wrote:
>I am thinking of making a simple gender-class system
>somewhat like Bantu languages. The idea might be to
>use the initial consonant to indicate class, e.g.
>
>B... =3D animal F... =3D tool J... =3D groups
>C... =3D plant G... =3D artifact K... =3D substances
>D... =3D human H... =3D other object L... =3D foods
>
>So if I had 20 or so categories what might they be,
>how best to categorize all of creation?
>
The system I use for Tj'a-ts'a~n is the following:
- animated: - human: - male
- female
- group
- animal: - male
- female
- group
- others animated (gods, extraterrestrians, etc...)
- inanimated: - plant
- part of animated=20
- object
- material
- pseudo-animated (what moves alone without being alive:
fire, planets, earthquakes, etc...)
- conceptual: - idea, doctrine (everything in -ism)
- "abstract" object ("a language" for instance)
- quality (in a broad sense)
It makes 15 gender classes, so easy to use with consonnant (unless
you're trying to make a Hawaian-like conlang with less than 10 consonnants).
The only problem I can see is that in Tj'a-ts'a~n, the gender system is more
a derivational system (the meaning of a root is precised by the gender
prefix, and a root can have different genders with different meanings).
Also, it's a system with subgenders and most of them are optional (like the
differentiation between sexes for humans and animals). But it can be a
beginning. I think it classes everything I can think of (and allows many
metaphors, what I think very important for a language).
>This might work nicely as a sort of hash table,
>but then it might be very tempting to use the
>initial vowel as well ...
>
>
Christophe Grandsire
|Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G.
"R=E9sister ou servir"
homepage: http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepage/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html