Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Gender classes, which to use?

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Wednesday, November 25, 1998, 11:48
At 07:13 25/11/98 +0000, you wrote:
>I am thinking of making a simple gender-class system >somewhat like Bantu languages. The idea might be to >use the initial consonant to indicate class, e.g. > >B... =3D animal F... =3D tool J... =3D groups >C... =3D plant G... =3D artifact K... =3D substances >D... =3D human H... =3D other object L... =3D foods > >So if I had 20 or so categories what might they be, >how best to categorize all of creation? >
The system I use for Tj'a-ts'a~n is the following: - animated: - human: - male - female - group - animal: - male - female - group - others animated (gods, extraterrestrians, etc...) - inanimated: - plant - part of animated=20 - object - material - pseudo-animated (what moves alone without being alive: fire, planets, earthquakes, etc...) - conceptual: - idea, doctrine (everything in -ism) - "abstract" object ("a language" for instance) - quality (in a broad sense) It makes 15 gender classes, so easy to use with consonnant (unless you're trying to make a Hawaian-like conlang with less than 10 consonnants). The only problem I can see is that in Tj'a-ts'a~n, the gender system is more a derivational system (the meaning of a root is precised by the gender prefix, and a root can have different genders with different meanings). Also, it's a system with subgenders and most of them are optional (like the differentiation between sexes for humans and animals). But it can be a beginning. I think it classes everything I can think of (and allows many metaphors, what I think very important for a language).
>This might work nicely as a sort of hash table, >but then it might be very tempting to use the >initial vowel as well ... > >
Christophe Grandsire |Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G. "R=E9sister ou servir" homepage: http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepage/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html