From: | <morphemeaddict@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Sunday, November 11, 2007, 3:24 |
In a message dated 11/10/2007 6:35:22 PM Central Standard Time, theiling@ABSINT.COM writes:> Are you really sure your people are willing to always keep up with the > current state of science? If a new planet is found, or the status of > a celestial body is changed, then the names in the language change? > If I were a speaker, I'd be way too stubborn for that. :-) > > **Henrik >You have a good point. It's the naming issue again. I tried to avoid that problem by simply numbering the worlds, but then the planets were redefined. Who could expect that, eh? But there are no "people". There is no conculture to go with this language. It is strictly for the real world. stevo </HTML>
Mr Veoler <veoler@...> |