Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: YASPR -- Yet Another Swedish Pronunciation Rant (fuit: THEORY: NATLANGS: Phonology and Phonetics: Tetraphthongs, Triphthongs, Diphthongs)

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Monday, May 29, 2006, 12:12
Citerar Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>:

> I still don't think length is phonemic in Swedish
And I still find analyzing vocalic length as subphonemic perverse. (The monthly instalment of "Andreas's reasons for phonemic vowel length in Swedish": if vocalic length is subphonemic, how am I supposed to account for the fact that _kvart_ [kvat`] and _fart_ [fA:t`] don't rhyme?) But to connect to what you said about the phantasmal nature of standard Swedish; we're arguing from 'lects that can't be reduced to a common phonology.
> I must point out that there is nothing freakish about my > pronunciation: it is a quite normal West Coast > pronunciation, i.e. I hear this kind of pronunciation around > me every day, though of course most people are not aware of > the different allophones in their own speech.
With such an open goal left before me, how can I fail to remark that West Coast pronunciations in general are freakish? :p
> >>and no true diphthongs -- e.g. |aj| being [Az\] as > >>often as not. > > > > > > I'm tempted to analyze Swedish Vj as diphthongs - partly because V:j is > > essentially absent - but I'm not gonna be obnoxious about it. I'm > unrepentantly > > obnoxious, however, about [au] in eg. _paus_ being a true diphthong! > > In a way it doesn't work for me, since my /j/ is normally [z\], > but OTOH [z\=:] *is* a perfectly possible realization of /i/ > for me! For _paus_ I have [pABs], but again I'm not sure that > I don't have [B=:] as a possible allegro realization of /8\/, > since non-instrumental analysis of one's own allegro speech > is inherently difficult!
Despite the spelling, my Sprachgefuehl is quite clear that the second part of "au" is /u/, not /8/. In informal speech, I rhyme _paus_ and _kaos_ (the later being bisyllabic in formal speech: ['kA:.Os]~['kA:.Us]). To a first approximation, written |au| is [au] in stressed position and [a] in unstressed position in my speech. Andreas

Reply

Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>