Re: Defending monosexuals

moan-oh-sexual? moan-o'-sexual? moan-no-sexual? more-know-sexual? more-
no-sexual? ;-)


But trysexuality rules!

Ingmar


On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 00:03:13 +0800, Eugene Oh <un.doing@...>
wrote:

>Then "buysexual" would be a customer. What would we replace "mono" with?
(:
>Eugene
>
>On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
>
>> Seems like "trysexual" would just be a synonym for "college student",
>> then... :)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/1/08, Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:29 PM, R A Brown
<ray@...>
>> wrote:
>> >> Now had you written 'trisexual' - that would've been rather odd. Some
>> >> strange conworld I guess     :)
>> >
>> > What about "trysexual" - willing to try anything out?
>> >
>> > Reminds me of "trylingual", which someone on LiveJournal's
>> > linguaphiles community tried to coin meaning (something like) "someone
>> > who's keen on trying out any language they come across; a language
>> > enthusiast".
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > --
>> > Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>>
>> Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
>>