Re: ML4 again (was Re: More questions)
From: | Stephen Mulraney <ataltanie@...> |
Date: | Saturday, November 29, 2003, 10:58 |
Tiëhţäk öp Ţrzict Mäkli: /t_j@xT@k 2 Ts`itst M{kli/
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Stephen Mulraney wrote:
>>Ho ho... sorry :) I can make a sound that satisfies _me_, but how close
>>it is to any notion of /T_j/ I know not.
>>But, notice the [] rather than the // :) I *think* it might (sometimes?
>>always?) just be realised as a palatal /s/.
> Actually, you have the meaning of [] and // mixed up. Slashes are used for
...
Dang. Yes, I know the difference in meaning. I get the brackets mixed up :).
I remember which was around it is, for a while, then I switch to the wroing
way, then when I've had enough to that I go back to the right way... sigh...
--
Stephen Mulraney ataltane@ataltane.net http://livejournal.com/~ataltane
I remember that I tried several times to use a slide rule, and that, several
times also, I began modern maths textbooks, saying to myself that if I were
going slowly, if I read all the lessons all in order, doing the exercises
and all, there was no reason why I should stall -- George Perec