Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Syllable structure - HELP!!!

From:taliesin the storyteller <taliesin@...>
Date:Tuesday, January 8, 2002, 15:17
* John-Emmanuel said on 2002-01-08 07:45:50 +0100
> I am currently appealing to everyone's creative and artistic abilities :D > I have finally polished the phonology and blends/diphthongs for my upcoming > conlang, and started creating a few roots and designing the grammar (at > least for nouns so far). However, I want to create a syllable structure > that doesn't have too many big consonant structures, but at the same time > doesn't sound like Japanese or a Polynesian language. (I have nothing > against them, of course, but I prefer the, well, Elvish sounds ;)
What about this: CCVC + CCVC > CCVCCVC etc. You then need rules to simplify the CCC-clusters to CC-clusters, here's some ideas: - the first C is removed: n+ks > ks - the first is removed but changes the next: n+ks > Ns you'll probably end up with a table of changes but that's worth it for a smooth flow - the middle C is removed: n+ks > ns etc. - some sounds are "magic" (and disappears), like the weird behavior of s in many (most) germanic languages, the only sound allowed first in triple C or more beginning clusters! r+sk > rk - only specific clusters are allowed between vowels so all clusters are changed into the allowed ones: r+m > mbr t+s > st or zd v+k > kv or gv or kf etc.
> Consonants: Nasals: M, m, N, n;
I've seen the mju-sign for M, and both my lang and ceqli uses q for N
> Vowels: a, e, é, i, o, ó, u, y (rounded i), ö (rounded é), @ (schwa) > (using Tolkien's orthography - for Quenya at least) > (y and ö are not common)
What happens if two vowels end up next to eachother, for instance in a compound? a+a > aha a?a a: a ei, what?
> So basically, what are your ideas? Should I stick to monosyllabic roots, or > should ones like VCVC be possible? Should roots only end in vowels, > consonants, or both? And how should I combine roots? I have spent many a > sleepless night on this problem, and have yet to come up with an > aesthetically pleasing solution. So I make a call to arms brother (and > sister) conlangers to smite this evil beast! :)
Heh, the important thing is choosing an orthography so that it becomes easy to -change- the orthography later :) I haven't lost nights to this question but've changed orthography QUITE a few times, as a matter of fact there's a message with a thrown-together 7-bit version sent yesterday, and I'm working on unicode-versions of the web-pages so that I can use all the diacritics I want ;) t., who misses being able to write emails on a *proper* computer...