Re: First Sound Recording of Asha'ille!
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Sunday, March 6, 2005, 14:36 |
Arthaey Angosii wrote at 2005-03-05 22:25:08 (-0800)
> Multi-comment reply to conserve posting limits...
>
>
> T'ves emaelivpeith René Uittenbogaard:
> > Wow - the recordings sound awesome! :) I particularly like the [n:]
> > (in line 1), [k_>] in line 6, and |mmavtec|.
>
> Is my |k'| really an ejective? I thought ejectives were strange sounds
> to be found in Semitic languages. I think of |k'| as a pure /k/ sound
> (or perhaps an aspirated variant thereof). Phoneticians, correct me if
> I'm wrong?
It sounds like an ejective to me (or, at least, it sounds like I do
when I try to produce an ejective). This does not surprise me. If
your language (i.e. English) doesn't make a distinction of
glottalization, and you try to produce a pure voiceless plosive
without any accompanying vowel, the easiest thing to do is close the
glottis and use glottalic initiation, that is, an ejective. At least
that's what I tend to do. ( I remember trying to produce totally pure
consonants as a child, dissatisfied that they always seemed to come in
the form of CV syllables... )
(Are there ejectives in Semitic languages? [checks...] Yes, in
Ethiopian Semitic and South Arabian languages.)
>
> T'ves emaelivpeith Tim May:
> > Why have you provided an IPA transcription of the morphemic breakdown
> > rather than the sentences as uttered? (That is what's going on there,
> > isn't it?)
>
> Yes, that is what's going on. I have a script that generates the
> webpage you see. All I give the script is the Asha'ille sentence
> (plus morphemic boundary markings) and the free English
> translation, and the program looks up all the other information
> from my dictionary. That's why the IPA is based on the morphemes,
> rather than the surface forms in the sentence. It's a drawback, but
> unless people really want to see a "real" IPA trascription..?
>
Well, I was interested to compare what I thought I was hearing with
what you thought you were saying - to see how many glottal stops there
are, for instance. Don't put yourself out on my account, though.
Reply