Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Constructive linguistics

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 9:45
From:    Sai Emrys <saizai@...>
> So: why not propose a serious study of "constructive linguistics" (as > opposed to, e.g. "descriptive linguistics" of the language-savers, and > "prescriptive linguistics" of the grammarians)?
I think there are both pragmatic and theoretical problems with this idea. First the theory. It's not clear exactly what the study of conlanging would contribute to the understanding of human languages. Natural languages are *far* more complex and intricate than any conlang has ever been. Obviously, I don't think that should stop people from creating conlangs, but I am not sanguine about the potential of coming up with something that would not immediately reveal itself to be artificial. Humans are too good at creating consistent generalizations, and when, rather than being handed a complex morass of conflicting generalizations in a real language environment, one is creating the whole language ab ovo, it's simply too easy to make the language brutally consistent. (Of course, some conlangers *want* consistency, which is their right.) Thus, conlangs are more likely to reveal facts about people's attitudes towards language than facts about language as such. Pragmatically, the problem is that it's really hard to get funding to research conlangs, and they don't easily fit into any of the humanities very well. What programs do exist are funded mostly by IALers like the Esperantists who often have motives other than art behind conlanging. (Also fine, but most conlangs aren't IALs.) If "constructive" or "creative" linguists has any place in academia, it would be from some kind of cross-disciplinary literary angle. Afterall, our patron saint is studied this way. :) (No, not Hildegard.) ----------------------------------------------------------- Chris wrote:
> I wouldn't turn it into a whole degree though because: > a) Anyone with such a degree would find it difficult to apply > in the job market and
Well, linguistics as it stands right now isn't terribly marketable.
> b) I doubt any university would be willing to support such a > degree.
I've become accustomed to too many crazy things said by academics to have strong opinions on this matter. :)
> A 10 credit module would be good though. :)
What's a "10 credit module"? ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637

Replies

Tristan McLeay <conlang@...>
Kevin Athey <kevindeanathey@...>