Re: Grammar idea
|From:||Yann Kiraly <yann_kiraly@...>|
|Date:||Friday, October 7, 2005, 13:32|
Ups, sorry. I accidentaly clicked send. The above message was a reply to Yahya Abdal-Aziz's reply.
Here's my reply to Jörg Rhiemeier:
In this language, I didn't try to reduce the number of words in a sentence, in
which case having the
relations of the arguments to X defined in the lexicon would be quite practical. In
addition, I think
Lojban has done this quite well already. Instead, I tried to get my language's syntax down to a
minimal set of rules that still alow normal, everyday comunication aswell as literature etc..
In response to Jonathan Knibb, I would like to see the grammar sketch of T4. Your other quiestions
should be answered by my definition of the relation between X and it's arguments in my last reply.
Thanks for all your replies,