For those who didn't catch it, this reply (re-reply?) mixed my response with
Christophe's(?) without making attribution to the other author he responded to.
Adam
Mau Rauszer <maurauser@...> wrote:Adam Walker 2003.03.27. 06:03:51 -8h-kor írta:
> Very Arabic. But some of your strokes look like they were drawn
> left-to-right rather than right-to-left. Maybe it's just my imagination.
> Like all Arabic-based scripts it is absolutely beautiful and absolutely
> incomprehensible.
Yeah. It is a sorta mix of arabic letterforms with Tengwar diacritics and
vowel indicating rules.
The dots above indicate the vowels and the ones below are just separating one
consonant from another. (There are only 11 letter forms and around 44 consonants
or if I also cont the ones which only occur in foreign words, I get 47.)
> A note about loading the page. I did get the error message you mentioned.
> When I hit reload I got two lines of nice red letters and the tippy-tops of
> some blue letters which still didn't load on a third try.
Well I got all the blue letters. Perhaps you should reload it without using the
browser cache.
> Am I right if I say that it's basically the Arabic script, just reversed in
> left-to-right direction and with a different use of dots and diacritics? (and
> with a dot used to separate words) Anyway, it still looks good ;)) .
Yeah. You're absolutely right, though the hand written letters differ a bit.
-- Mau Rauser | Mwarauzi