Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Notation Question

From:R.M. Whelton <rmwhelton@...>
Date:Sunday, March 27, 2005, 12:39
Bingo! Once I had an idea what I was looking for, it didn't take long at
all.
Thanks for the help, Roger!

In case anyone else is interested, here's probably the most useful
document I've found so far:
https://intranet.utsc.utoronto.ca/docroot/files/section.13206/Jan.31.Formulating.rules.pdf

Robin


Roger Mills wrote:

>Robin Whelton wrote: > > >>I'm reading about sound changes in languages, and I keep seeing >>what I can tell is a formal notation system. It's obviously set up >>as A > B / C where A is the original sound, B is the sound it >>changes into, and C is the environment in which the change occurs. >>So far, so good. >> >>My problem is that I can't seem to find a list of how to read all >>the symbols used in the notation. Does the darned thing have >>a proper name that I could feed to Google? Is there a site out >>there somewhere with a guide for reading this stuff, that some >>kind soul could pass on to me? >> >> >I'm not sure about whatever notation may be used in computer programs, if >that's what you're after; but in terms of rule-writing, abbreviatory >conventions, features, etc. you might try to search "generative phonology", >or locate one of the old textbooks (e.g. Robert Harms, "Intro. to >Phonological Theory", Prentice-Hall 1968; ppbk. ed. 1970). Modern >"optimality theory" uses some of the same rule forms and conventions too. (I >don't think Gen.Phon. is still in vogue, though lots of the conventions are >still in use.) Even a skim through Chomsky and Halle's "Sound Pattern of >English" might provide a crash-course (though their application of the >theory to Engl. phonology is almost a reductio ad absurdum IMO!!!) > >In fact, I suspect Gen.PHon. came about in the 60s-70s once scholars, >inspired by Chomsky's view of lang. as "rule-governed behavior", got >acquainted with their universities' computers-- certainly the need for >careful attention to rule order, careful rule-writing, the idea that there >was an input ("underlying form") and an output ("surface form"), etc. seem >to derive I think from computerese. > > > >