Cyrillic (Was: Re: Re: Fänyläjikyl Inglyx)
|From:||Roland Hoensch <hoensch@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, December 8, 1999, 17:07|
I myself find cyrillic much more agreeable for any sort of
phoneticization. I think it is worth learning, especcially in
its Serbo-Croatian format for any conlanger. =3D)
----- Original Message -----
From: Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...>
To: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: F=E4nyl=E4jikyl Inglyx
> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:41:27 -0800 Roland Hoensch <hoensch@...>
> > Any thoughts? Has anyone else tried to devise a phonological
> > spelling
> > system for English? Maybe one that looks a bit better? With
> > another
> > script? Cyrillic, maybe? I think I myself shall try something on
> > the latter.
> Well, this doesn't really have to do with it :-), but the Cyrillic
> alphabet makes a much better transliteration scheme for Rokbeigalmki th=an
> the Latin alphabet does.
> -Stephen (Steg)
> "Eze-guvdhab wa'hrikh-a tze, / "zhoutzii wa'esh," i eze-mwe."
> Why pay more to get Web access?
> Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
> Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.