Re: Men vs Women on Conlang
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 6:48 |
--- Sally Caves skrzypszy:
> > Then there's the other situation: I'm a man, and I've never made a single
> > a posteriori language. Never even been interested in trying. Just
> > another datum for you all...
>
> Yeah, I'm with you there. What's the point? What's so "masculine" about a
> posteriori languages? Or so "feminine" about a priori conlangs?
I never implied a posteriori conlanging is more "masculine" than a priori
conlanging, nor did I say that a priori conlanging is female business. All I
noticed is that in the field of a posteriori conlanging women are
underrepresented even more.
> As for gender and conlanging, I think that more men in 1990 had access to
> computers, but as that changes we'll see how many more women are drawn to a
> public display of their inventions.
Yes, I agree.
> Only recently have women wanted to go on-line and talk about their fantasy
> inventions to mostly men. Mau, Camilla, Heather, Nicole, Mia, Irina, go for
> it. Times are a-changin'.
Silvia Sotomayor, Amanda Babcock, Keolah, the other Nicole...
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Reply