Re: Inverse case?
From: | Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 2, 2007, 22:16 |
In the last episode, (On Monday 02 July 2007 23:13:12), Jeff Rollin wrote:
> In the last episode, (On Monday 02 July 2007 23:11:09), Jeff Rollin wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > You've probably heard of "inverse number", where the marked form for each
> > noun is the /unusual/ number for that noun: e.g. in a language where
> > there is a dual number, the dual for "two eyes" would be unmarked, and
> > the singular and plural would be marked, i.e.
> >
> > Sing. Dual Pl.
> >
> > komo ko komo
> >
> > Conversely, the word for "grass" would be marked in the singular (i.e. "a
> > blade of grass) and dual and unmarked in the plural:
> >
> > Sing. Dual Pl.
> >
> > lolomo lolo lolo
>
> Oops! "lolomo" should appear in the plural too ;-)
>
> Jeff
Dear, oh, dear. I really am getting confused. Here's what the paradigm
for "lolo" "a blade of grass" should *really* be:
Sing. Dual Pl.
lolomo lolomo lolo
--
"Please understand that there are small
European principalities devoted to debating
Tcl vs. Perl as a tourist attraction."
-- Cameron Laird