Re: Workshops Review from Yitzik the Snakie
From: | Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <daniel.andreasson@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 19, 2002, 14:01 |
Jan wrote:
> Sure, a group needs a certain mininum number of (active) people to become
> viable. A Finno-Lappic (UraliConlang?) group would attract perhaps three of
> four active conlangers and a few other interested people, but that would be > far
> from enough. It would be doomed to be eternally dormant.
> Really, I don't see any reason why the whole world suddenly has to be
> subdivided into regional conlang groups. Nothing should prevent you from
> posting about Seimi to Conlang (which I would welcome, anyway).
Yes, exactly. I wasn't entirely serious with my FinnoLappiconlang group.
This sudden need to split the Conlang-L into subgroups confuses me too.
Perhaps I should have said that right out instead of suggesting yet another
ridiculous group which probably only would attract me and Matt with his
Vyääh. :)
And I promise that if I do any more work on Seimi, I will certainly post it
here and nowhere else. :)
Daniel Andreasson
--
Daeselaidh goddi mis giall! Lwodadh giall!
Reply