Re: Nattiki (was: Re: speaking and saying)

Matt Pearson scripsit:

> Both interchangeably.  The linguist's job, as I see it, is to match
> up the empirical generalisations with the theoretical generalisations.
> After all, a theory is meaningless unless it's supported by carefully
> collected data, and carefully collected data is meaningless unless
> you have a theory that can explain it insightfully.  Gotta have both!
In short, concepts without percepts are hollow, percepts without
concepts are blind.  Go Go Kantians.

--
John Cowan                                      cowan@ccil.org
                e'osai ko sarji la lojban.