Re: New Site: New Language: Tyl-Sjok
From: | daniel andreasson <daniel.andreasson@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, April 18, 2001, 14:18 |
Henrik Theiling wrote:
> Hmm, yeah, but the agent slot is assigned by control in Tyl-Sjok, not
> by whether its a state or dynamic. E.g. in `Peter is violent' (ok,
> you could say that's a durative action (l. violans...)), `Peter' is
> agent. Tyl-Sjok distinguishes this precisely. Some verbs even have a
> floating assignment depending on meaning:
>
> stupid.VERB peter.PATIENT
> Peter is stupid. (inherently)
> vs.
> Peter.AGENT stupid.VERB.
> Peter is stupid. (but he is at least in potential control)
Ha! This is *exactly* like in Rinya! The only difference is that
the AGT argument follows the verb and the PAT argument precedes
it. But I have the control vs. non-control difference, and inherent
vs. temporary state, etc. I'm pretty sure I've written about this
to the list. Lemme see... Ah, there it is:
jinea danielin
is:peculiar daniel:AGT
'Daniel is peculiar (deliberatly and it makes him look stupid).'
daniel jinea
daniel:PAT is:peculiar
'Daniel is peculiar (from birth, and that makes him cool).'
I have borrowed most of it from Central Pomo. Where did you get
your influences from?
This is very cool! :)
||| daniel
--
<> Qheil rynenya alandea! <> daniel.andreasson@telia.com <>
<> Rinya lawea! <> Daniel Andreasson <>
Reply