Re: Quick Latin pronunciation question
| From: | Eugene Oh <un.doing@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, May 26, 2008, 16:31 |
|---|
I think he meant "with consequent palatalisation _of_ the preceding
consonant" i.e. due to the [j] etc. etc.
Eugene
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Lars Finsen <lars.finsen@...> wrote:
> Den 26. mai. 2008 kl. 10.22 skreiv Ray Brown:
>
>> In VL prevocalic _i_ was always [j] with consequent palatalization
>> preceding consonant.
>
> What do you mean exactly? Is the following vowel palatalised if a consonant
> follows, or what?
>
> LEF
>