> Reading Greenberg's list of universals
>
> 
http://angli02.kgw.tu-berlin.de/Korean/Artikel02/Appendix3.html
>
> I've discovered that Khangaþyagon violates universals 2,3,6,10,12, and
> possibly 23 although I'm not sure of his terminology. This is mainly
> because Khangaþyagon is based on what seemed plausible to me without
> reading the list.
>
> I'd be interested to know how many universals other people's conlangs
> violate, and whether this came about naively or deliberately.