Re: CHAT: (no subject)
From: | Pablo Flores <fflores@...> |
Date: | Friday, March 5, 1999, 23:41 |
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!
XX!
!
!
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXFromBcc:
Return-Path: fflores@arnet.com.ar
Message-ID: <059911537200539MX1@...>
Date: 5 Mar 1999 20:37:16 +0000
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
s by name in
> mundane circumstances. See also
> Evocative, Invocative, and
> Incantative, which are special
> versions of the Vocative. They are
> all used in direct address, not in
> ordinary sentences.
> Evocative
> Speaking to one who is on another
> plane of existence
Which person gets marked for evocative, the speaker or
the hearer in another plane of existence? Could you
post some examples of each case?
[snip]
> Abfiative
> The original form of a
> transformation (=Talislan "from" in
> the sentence "he changed from a
> prince into an exomorph")
> Adfiative
> The final form of a transformation
> (=Talislan "to" in the above
> sentence)
Really cool stuff.
>
> Any further ideas for "magical" cases or other grammatical constructions
> welcomed!
Lots of ideas! Just not to repeat what others said,
I'd propose: nouns (and adjectives) with inflections
that tell you if they are really what they seem, or
a bad thing in disguise, or a good thing that just looks
awful because it's been transformed, or you don't know,
etc. For example:
QST = you ask yourself if this is really true
HOR = different from what is meant in a horrible way
NAM = not as much as it seems
AFR = you're afraid of this
(You're walking with Xyz and see a tall ivory castle beyond)
You: What a beautiful castle.QST!
Xyz: It's Morgana's home.HOR. She lives there with her
servants.HOR. She's a really beautiful.QST lady.QST.
You: I did hear she's beautiful.NAM. Will we meet her.AFR?
I don't know if this is mystic, or magic, but it has a
certain schizoid flavour that seems appropriate for "dark"
fantasy.
--Pablo Flores
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Fooling around with alternating current
is a waste of time. Nobody will use
it, ever.
Thomas Edison