Re: "H"'s (Was: Re: aquamarine demon (was <no subject>))
|From:||Michael Poxon <m.poxon@...>|
|Date:||Friday, November 23, 2001, 21:54|
Hi. Could be because /x/ tends to prefer (in many languages) back vowels, as
it shares more features with them. See if /xa/ and /ha/ tend to lead you to
allophony as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@...>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: "H"'s (Was: Re: aquamarine demon (was <no subject>))
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Henrik Theiling wrote:
> > > ObConlang: Needless to say, none of my conlangs have a /h/. The sound
> > > spelt <h> is invariably a /x/.
> > Really! I find it quite nice to have phonemic /h/ and /?/. Great
> > consonants! Only to beat by pharyngeal and epiglottal ones! :-)
> Hmm, recently I've been noticing that the way I pronounce /x/ and /h/ are
> quite (too) similar. My conlang distinguishes between /x/, /h/ and /?/,
> but /xi/ and /hi/ sound a bit too alike to my ears. I was in fact thinking
> of making them allophonic :-P Maybe in a descendent lang they will merge.
> That should produce all kinds of interesting special cases (sorta like
> Attic Greek's _ei^mi_ and eimi'_ business, really confusing).
> "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." -- P.Erdos