OT: Tidal waves (was: Let me introduce myself)
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 1, 2005, 1:08 |
Thomas R. Wier wrote at 2004-12-31 11:40:26 (-0600)
> From: "B. Garcia" <madyaas@...>
> > # 1 wrote:
> >
> > > - tidal waves (is that the word?) -
> >
> > these are the same as Tsunamis
>
> Actually, no, they aren't. Tidal waves are caused by the
> gravitation of the moon, while tsunamis are caused by seismic
> changes in the earth's crust. And parts of Atlantic Canada are
> witness to the largest variations in tidal changes on the planet.
Well, yes and no. "Tidal wave" _is_ used to refer to seismic
sea-waves in English, has been for a long time, and may well still be
more often used thus than in the technically correct sense. My
Japanese-English dictionaries translate _tsunami_ as "tidal wave" and
vice versa.
I understand the technical distinction, and I'm sympathetic to the
desire to harmonize technical and popular usage. But outside a
specific context, it's almost as misleading to say that tsunamis are
not the same as tidal waves as to say that they are, particularly when
there's a non-native speaker involved.
Incidentally, the earliest attested use of the term "tsunami" in
English appears to have been by Lafcadio Hearn in _Gleanings in
Buddha-Fields_ (1897):
"From immemorial time the shores of Japan have been swept, at
irregular intervals of centuries, by enormous tidal waves,--tidal
waves caused by earthquakes or by submarine volcanic action. These
awful sudden risings of the sea are called by the Japanese tsunami."