Re: Workshops Review #7

Gracie V. wrote:

<<I suppose I could re-arrange the list I already have, if anybody besides me
is
interested in such.>>

As you see, ppl indeed have such need.

<<I don't really do the whole 'moderator' thing, though, so
everybody'd just have to be resolved to posting whatever they please.>>

I'm sure conlangers are mostly nice ppl, and you'll have little work to do as
such...

And Garth Wallace wrote:

<<What would the list for conlangs with multiple source languages be?>>

I think Eamon Graham gives agood reply:

<<Good question; as creoles and non-p/c mixed languages are my first
love and main study since the age of God only knows when, I'd be
sensitive to the phrasing... something like ContactConlangs could
cover all pidgins, semi-creoles, non-p/c mixed languages, trade
jargons, etc.>>

So it seems that contact conlangs are the most attractive topic. I favor it
too. Africa and Native America may wait till better times (or better
advertizing>).
Rearrange your list, Gracie, into "ContactConlangs", announce it here by giving
the link, and be sure you'll see it mentioned in the weekly review!

Be kheyro (=for good),
Yitzik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply