Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?
| From: | Peter Clark <peter-clark@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, April 21, 2003, 22:06 |
|---|
On Monday 21 April 2003 04:56 pm, Eamon Graham wrote:
> If that's the opinion you have then you must not look at the
> websites of the folks who regularly post on this list.
That's probably because he's too busy re-inventing Ro[1]. ;>
:Peter
[1] The most perfect[2] philosophical language.
[2] Perfect in that no one ever feels the need to trumpet its advantages over
other IALs.
--
Oh what a tangled web they weave who try a new word to conceive!