> En réponse à Tristan McLeay :
>
>
>> So in other words they're like women: totally evil but absolutely
>> necessary?[1]
>
>
> LOL. Actually I've never found them evil. They are pretty simple
> actually.
>
>
>> exp(x)=e^x?
>
>
> Yes. Originally, e^ix is really only a practical abbreviation for (cos
> x+i*sin x), but it proves to contain more than that :) .
>
>
>> Been cursing science a lot, have you? or just cursing in a scientific
>> way? :P
>
>
> Both actually ;))) .
>
>
>> Wow. I'm impressed. I'd asked this question to a few people, but no-one
>> could answer it (the best I'd got was from my father: 'something to do
>> with trigonometry'
>
>
> Not far :)) .
>
>> I think (he used to be a mechanical engineer)). I
>> hadn't really asked anyone who would really know, though, I don't think.
>
>
> Well, it may be that in France we learn complex numbers quite early (last
> year of high school) so we use them more than the rest of the world?
>
> Christophe Grandsire.
>
>
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
>
> You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.
>