Re : Re: Creole vs. Pidgin
|From:||From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <lassailly@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, July 24, 1999, 22:13|
Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 24/07/99 21:05:32 , Nik a =E9crit :
> I suspect where misunderstanding each other here. Are you saying that
> whether a verb was -are, -ere, -e:re, or -ire was determined by if the
> verb had a perfect/imperfect/stative meaning, or are you saying that the
> tenses of Latin were arranged by perfect-imperfect-stative? Your first
> e-mail sounded like you meant the first, that there was meaning to being
> -are, -ere, -e:re, or -ire, but this one sounds like you're talking
> about the tenses.
i mean the first, saying latin tagging is not consitent. it's no tense, it's=20
aspective, that is, aspect within the definition of the verb before=20
of the sentence.