Re: Classifying my languages.
| From: | And Rosta <a-rosta@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, May 17, 2002, 2:01 |
|---|
Carlos:
> Interlect: this should be the ultimate international auxiliary
> language. Well. not realy. But it should be consistent in what I
> believe an IAL should be. I begun with a definition of the goals, and
> then begun to invent and see if the language fulfit those goals.
>
> EndZl{Nz: would Interlect apply, And? I guess I should be more specific
> on the rules and how to measure the goals.
Yes, unless your goals & solutions are not susceptible to rational
debate (e.g. if you want the language to have an uncanny beauty,
or if you wish its structure to reflect the divine harmonies of the
cosmos, or stuff like that).
--And.