Re: Workshops Review #4
From: | Isaac A. Penzev <isaacp@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 13, 2003, 10:18 |
-- Shreyas Sampat scripsit:
> Are you reviewing only specifically natlang-rooted conlang groups, or
> laboring under some other criterion?
To say frankly, yes. Natlang-rooted or at least "styled".
-- Jan van Steenbergen scripsit:
<<< Well, strictly speaking, Conculture is an offshoot of Conlang as well.
Not to
mention those conlang groups that are not directly related to Conlang:
Conlangs-in-use, Artificial Languages 2, Langmaker2, Ougloupo, Ideolengua,
Ideolenguas-en-uso, Mothertongue, and I'm sure there must be a few others
that
I don't remember right now.>>>
I'm a member of all of them except Mothertongue (and have joined the
C-in-use just today; as for AL2, for some reasons I'm nomail there now), but
I don't include them into review.
<<<But I wouldn't send out poor Yitzik to make reports about all those
groups; his
mailbox would probably burst within a day. Conculture, lately, is sometimes
even more active than Conlang itself.>>>
Right you are, my friend! And I also have Real Life (TM). ANd I'm not
particularly interested in conculturing; that's not my cup of tea.
Truly yours,
Yitzik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~