Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A really odd language: Tolborese

From:Nihil Sum <nihilsum@...>
Date:Monday, September 2, 2002, 16:15
Ká "H. S. Teoh" bitosh mahilas ne:

>...one of my goals in creating >Ebisedian was to make it as unconventional as possible, >yet at the same time as "intuitive" as possible. At least to me. :-P
As I continue to develop Tolborese, its grammar should become more intuitive to me. One learns a language as one writes it. At present, though, it is still difficult for me to think in this mode.
>I find that weirder than the fact that Ebisedian's pronouns do not >distinguish between 2nd and 3rd person. :-P
Really? You find something in Tolborese to be weirder than something in Ebisedian? ... Victory is MINE! :) (and quit sticking out your tongue at me) Agrau si "Thomas R. Wier":
>Well, his system *is* a case system. It marks grammatical >roles quite explicitly. It just does so in a way quite >unlike most human languages.
I suppose so. Any noun marked for an agent is a patient; any noun marked for a patient is an agent. Difficult to mark for any other cases though. For example, would a noun in the dative -- say, a recipient --be marked for the agent of the transaction, from which it was receiving the patient, or for the patient of this transaction as received from the agent? I don't think I'll go there at all. Other cases will be marked by prepositions (or postpositions?), and I think I will have these pre(post?)positions take markers for the class of the noun to which they refer.
>I tend to favor head marking languages, so all my languages >have verbal cross-reference.
Surely you don't use the same structure for every project! I remember seeing something like this in that site about the "conlanger's code", where it asked questions like which kind of phonology or structure you "prefer". As if one would use the same phonology for every language, or the same grammatical structure! Well, maybe someone would -- but not me. Ki ya, Nihil Sum, ekirirmi:
>The "people" and "animals" classes are not entirely correct. I'll >explain it later. More on these and other noun classes as I make >them up.
Tolborese, I've decided, was a dead language. In modern times, it was revived by the Tolborese Independence Movement, which unfortunately was absorbed into the Tolborese Supremacy Movement, and later took the less suspicious name the Tolborese Freedom Movement. The old religion was revived, and the language and religion both suffered many embellishments by people using them for political ends. Originally, old Tolborese DID use the bu/wa class for people, and the zi/vi class for animals. Revived Tolborese, however, uses bu/wa only for the Tolbors and gods of the reconstructed Tolborese mythology. Other ethnicities are referred to with zi/vi, like animals. NS _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

Reply

Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>