| From: | Joe <joe@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 19:04 |
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 6:38 pm, John Cowan wrote:> Joe scripsit: > > I agree, though I think it's still derived from 'the', rather that 'et'. > > How could "the" have mutated into something with a /t/, realized as [?], > at the end of the syllable?/inD@/ > /inD/ > /ind/ > /int/ > /in?/ How about that?
| John Cowan <jcowan@...> |