Re: Probability of Article Replacement?
From: | Doug Dee <amateurlinguist@...> |
Date: | Sunday, March 2, 2003, 18:16 |
In a message dated 3/1/2003 2:07:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
czhang23@AOL.COM writes:
> This is an interesting topic... I searched thru my ConLang "Syntax"
> notes
> and found this - written by David E. Bell:
>
> amman iar definite determiners distinguish four levels of definiteness.
>
> (snip description)
Interesting. My (still very sketchy) principal conlang has 4 kinds of
article:
1. Definite: "The dog bit me."
2. Generic: "The dog was the first animal domesticated by humans." "Dogs are
mammals."
3. Specific indefinite: "I'm looking for a dog. (It was here a minute ago; it
must have run off.)"
4. Nonspecific indefinite: "I'm looking for a dog. (I haven't had one since
I was a child; I'd like to get one again.)"
I was distinct annoyed to read in _Definiteness_ that "It has often been
pointed out that no language has noun phrases distinctively generic in form."
That is, my article #2 seems to violate a linguistic universal that generics
are treated as either definite or indefinite.
Doug
Replies