| From: | caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 13:19 |
>R A Brown <ray@...> wrote:>Nope - That would surely imply *artilang, and *auxilang? The idea of >'engelang' was surely to keep it in line with monosyllabic prefix >plus -lang.Perhaps we could spell it <englang> and all agree that the <g> is pronounced as the <g> in "margarine." :-) Charlie