Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: How do you say 'Hello' to an alien?

From:Joe <joe@...>
Date:Friday, August 1, 2003, 18:21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Johansson" <andjo@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: How do you say 'Hello' to an alien?


> Quoting Joe <joe@...>: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ian Spackman" <ianspackman@...> > > > > > > > > > > The length of the message (in bits) was a product of two primes.
When
> > the > > > > > sequence of bits was rasterred onto a rectangle whose sides were
the
> > > > > factors of the length of the message, a rather blocky bitmapped
image
> > > >appeared. > > > > > > > > > > "Aceribo message" would probably be a useful search term to find
what
> > was > > > >sent. > > > > > > > >Yeah..um...What kind of insane aliens would think of that kind of
thing?
> > > > > > > > > Well, I don't think it's *that* obscure. If you have the idea of it
being
> > > binary, the two-prime-number thing would suggest a rectangle to anyone
who
> > > has any half-decent maths, I'd think. And (bigger if) if they have a > > sense > > > of bilateral symmetry they could even tell which reading is the right > > > one. What I've always doubted is that they'd figure out anything much > > > encoded in the message. > > > > > > Still, if they get that far it's enough to suggest there's some sort
of
> > > "intelligent life" out there, I'd have thought. > > > > > > It's still a massive longshot, but I think the prime number thing is
the
> > > simplest bit of it. :) > > > > Yes, but who's going to look at the fact that something has, say,
twenty-one
> > bits and say 'Oh look! It's a product of two primes! Let's map it onto a > > rectangle!'. It just doesn't seem [?plausible] > > Anyone with a mathematically inclined brain? > > If I got hold of a string of zeros and ones, and had reason to suspect it > contained a message encoded in a way intended to be "obvious", it's the
kind
> of thing I look after.
Thing is, I wouldn't usually interpret the size of the message as part of the decoding device. Probably a personal bias of mine..sorry..