Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: 'rhotic plosives' (was: laterals)

From:Javier BF <uaxuctum@...>
Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 21:01
>Even if, for the say of argument at this point, I accept a complete >closure is made in rapid succession in a trill (whether made with the apex >of the tongue or with the uvular [the latter is heard in certain regions >of north Wales]), I have never been aware of any plosion of the release.
Are you saying that the air stops to flow while the trill is being produced so that upon each closure no outward movement of air is produced? Then, no, you're wrong. I've being pronouncing trills all my life (I'm a native Spanish speaker) and I can assure you that while pronouncing a trill there's a steady outward movement of air only interrupted by the brief closures, after each of which a plosive release is produced by necessity because more air is coming from behind to push it out.
>I'm less familiar with flaps (books say it occurs in RP pronunciation of >_very_ - but that's a good half century out of date, i think), but when i >have heard them I've not been aware of any noticeable plosion.
Listen to a Hindi retroflex flap.
>Quite - the top of the tongue _vibrates_ (that's why it's often called an >_apical_ trill); similarly, the uvular vibrates when a uvular trill is >made. There's no way a uvular trill is a rapid succession of uvular voiced >plosives.
Try pronouncing "da-da-da-da-da..." quickly, very quickly, yet more and more and more quickly. You'll end up pronouncing a trill "rrrrrrra", because a vibratory movement is simply a raising/lowering where the distance between the high and the low point is small. And when the sequence of plosives is very quick you literally don't have time to raise and lower your tongue but only a small distance, while during a normal plosive that distance is much longer because you aren't urged to raise your tongue again just after a millisecond of having lowered it. But as for what defines a plosive, which is not the distance covered by the tongue during its upward and downward movement but the fact that the airstream is effectively blocked and then released, this occurs the same both in normal plosives as in tap and trill plosives. If no effective block is produced during a trill, you get sounds such as the "rz" and "rzh" fricative trills you can hear in certain varieties of Spanish, in Czech or in Mandarin.
>> A tap would >> make sense to call a very brief stop,
A plosive trill is just quick succession of plosive taps. Or, that's to say, a quick succession of brief plosives.
>OK (as I said, I'm less familiar with flaps) - brief tho it may be, is the >duration long enough for the block air stream to produce any significant >plosion?
If there is an effective closure, the plosion is produced _by necessity_. But in a tap/flap that plosion is very quick, that's precisely what distinguishes it from a non-rhotic plosive.
>> Approximant-flap? What's that mean? How can something be both a flap >> and an approximant? > >Quite. This is absolutely confusing! Above Javier is maintaining that a >flap is a plosive, i.e. the airstream is blocked and then released with >plosion.
No, I said that taps/flaps are _usually_ plosive. But I also pointed out that fricative and approximant taps/flaps aren't uncommon; they happen as allophones of /4/ in Spanish, for example.
>Even if we discount the 'plosive' description of a flap, nevertheless, we >can say that a flap is caused a rapid contact between two organs of >articulation. How can you have a rapid contact (i.e. rapid closure) and >the thing still be a flap?
Just don't define a flap in terms of degree of closure but in terms of rhoticity, because what distinguishes a flap from non-rhotic plosives/fricatives/approximants is the quickness with which it is pronounced, not the degree of closure. In my other message I explained that degree of closure and rhoticity are two different articulatory dimensions that do not exclude each other. What really defines a tap/flap is it's being a single-pulse rhotic consonant (as opposed to multiple-pulse rhotic consonants and to non-rhotic consonants) and not its being plosive, fricative or approximant. Thus, a tap/flap is a single rapid movement where one organ comes close to another, regardless of whether they go all the way and touch each other or merely come close enough to produce friction or just close enough to produce a frictionless continuant. Cheers, Javier

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>