Re: Alien conlang idea

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:49:19 +0100, Peter Bleackley
<Peter.Bleackley@...> wrote:
>>Is there an example where a noun marked with 'uo' wouldn't make sense as
>>the experiencer of the appropriate verb, or where 'oae' wouldn't make
>>sense in the dative case? I could see 'give' as the agent/essive as well,
>>though I wouldn't conclude that just from this example.
>
>To a certain extent they do, but I don't imagine them being limited to
>those roles. Let's see, if we suppose ltr (message) and __aa (be), we could
>have
>
>osalfe ltara
>
>I-recieve message-be
>
>There is a message which I recieve, or I recieve a message.
This could be considered to be a dative, too: There is a message to me.

g_0ry@_^s:
j. 'mach' wust

Reply