| From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sunday, May 27, 2007, 19:15 |
On 5/27/07, R A Brown <ray@...> wrote:> But the ancient _ (h)ekatón_ (Arcadian _hekoton_) is from *_sem kn=tom_ > = one hundred :)Oh! Never knew that. Fascinating.> If one has _e-kósio_, for the reasons I've stated above, then it does > not seem unreasonable to me to have _e-déka_ for the sake of consistency.And no confusion with *éndeka, since that becomes _e-déka enó_ in EAK. Cheers, -- Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>