Re: evolving languages
From: | Joseph Fatula <fatula3@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 21:08 |
From: "Florian Rivoal" <florian@...>
Subject: evolving languages
> with a couple of friends, we recently decided to start to create a whole
set of conlangs, evolving and interacting through time.
>
> i am wondering about what kind of change time can bring to a language
>
> i have a vague idea of how sound change can occur, and borrowings is not
so difficult for me to comprehend. but appart from that, i hardly know how
grammar and sintax is likely to change.
>
> about phonetics, i am not asking for lots of sound change rules sample.
tendencies would be more usefull to me (simplification or complexification,
apperance/ disapearance of tones , ...)
Regarding the change over time of grammar and syntax, let me give you a
(hypothetical) example. Imagine we have a language where plurals are formed
by adding "-et".
So we might have the following pairs:
arul arulet
ruk ruket
ven venet
gut gutet
tas taset
bord bordet
Then, as the language changes over time, a rule comes in:
t > th / stop consonant, vowel, t
So our list of pairs would be:
arul arulet
ruk ruketh
ven venet
guth guthet
tas taset
bord bordeth
Now our plural-forming rule is a bit more complex. The rule would be, add
"-et" after a word, but "-eth" after b, d, g, p, t, or k. Perhaps another
rule came in:
t > ch / fricative, vowel, t
Making our pairs as follows:
arul arulet
ruk ruketh
ven venet
guth guthech
tas tasech
bord bordeth
Now we have an even more complicated plural-forming rule. When it gets too
complicated to handle, people will start simplifying it in whatever ways
seem good at the time, not necessarily those that make sense historically.
I hope this example helps.
Joe