Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Volition in Anohim

From:bob thornton <arcanesock@...>
Date:Sunday, October 24, 2004, 20:51
--- Sally Caves <scaves@...> wrote:

> You know I can't leave this message alone! :) > Volition is the meat and > drink of the active Teonim. I'm still making > mistakes in it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "bob thornton" <arcanesock@...> > > > > The nature of volition in Anohim is very > complicated. > > This sounds like a response to a question, Bob. Did > I miss a thread that > was called something else and developed into a > discussion of volitionality?
No, I just accost the list with Anohim occasionally.
> > Whether a motion is voluntary or involuntary is > always > > marked. Several verbs, mainly of transference are > also > > always marked. Kill is considered a motive verb. > > It is in Teonaht, too, but where the form of the > word impedes (like lis > (get) or den (tell), one can always tell from the > article whether the > subject is v or nv. So Teonaht has a peculiar kind > of active system, one > that has a volitional S along with a volitional V. > Many of the verbs are > ambivolitional (where the meaning changes), whereas > as some are always > volitional, others always non-volitional. So in > some cases it is the > subject that determines volitionality, and in other > cases the verb. But > both S and V have to be marked in some way.
Question: What are S and V here?
> > > Volition sometimes changes the meaning of the > word. > > Get/take and kill/die are two volition pairs. > > Lisned, bettairem in Teonaht: get/take. A subject > with lis is the passive > recipient of action, and lisned is often used to > express what we call the > "passive": aid bikar(em) eton-li lis. "The tree > gets its chopping." There > is a different word for "receive" that is > volitional, since one can refuse > to receive something. > > However, I don't see kill/die as a volitional pair > so much as a > subject/recipient pair. One can die at the hands of > one who kills. One can > die in one's bed. One can commit suicide. I've > also noted that idioms in > language don't necessarily have to make sense to us > in our first language. > But it sort of feels like making get/give a > volitional pair. Do you see > what I mean? Get/take I understand. In Teonaht, > conceivably, one can kill > by accident as in manslaughter. It's an important > legal verb.
Ah, yes. That makes sense. I hadn't thought of that.
> > Here are some verbs that are always volitional: > > say, talk, do, give, make, go, come, allow, decide, > attack, read, write, > chase, conquer, promise, command, doff, don, > clothe, feed, cook, eat, > drink, love, hate, prefer, holler, spit, pray, > convict, berate, and a host > of others. > > Here are some verbs that are always non-volitional: > > be, exist, be ignorant of, be absent, be present, be > happy, sad, blue, > fiery, stupid and a bunch of other stative verbs in > T; get, sleep, fall > asleep, wake up, sicken, vomit, bleed, die, dream, > have (inalienable), > beware, trip, fall down, etc. > > The ambivolitional verbs cover the senses, of > course, and cognition: > > hear/listen to; see/watch or look at; smell/sniff; > feel/touch or caress; > taste/lick; know of/find out about; perceive/test > etc. > > But the ambivolitional verbs, I find, as I write > more and more in Teonaht, > are a much bigger category than those verbs that are > only one or the other: > > cry (in response to)/mourn; > laugh (at a joke)/deride or make light of > dislike/hate (to the point of malice) > like/prefer > stand (as a tree does)/stand up or take a stand > lie (as a log does)/lie down, lie low > follow (as a shadow does)/pursue > live (breathe)/dwell > breathe/draw breath > bounce/rebound actively, return with renewed vigor > die passively/commit suicide > walk (as a clock or any machine part does)/walk > somewhere > stop/cease purposely > sit (as a spoon does)/sit down > rest (out of fatigue)/rest deliberately > speed up (as a ball does rolling down a hill/hasten > think (wandering thoughts)/contemplate > be ignorant of/ignore > believe (blindly)/believe something you've given > thought to > misspeak/lie > make a mistake/be in wilful error > defecate (shit one's pants)/defecate on will > urinate (piss oneself)/urinate, relieve oneself > etc. > > Then: > boil (as water does)/boil something in a pot > freeze (as water does)/freeze something > heat up (as anger does)/heat someone up > drown (as a swimmer does)/immerse > end (as a play does)/put an end to > > (here we are getting into states and creating > states, and these AV > verbs are usually distinguished by > intransitivity/transitivity. There is > also a suffix (-ma) that turns an adjective or a > nonvolitional intransitive > into a volitional transitive:
Hrrrm... I might just ste-... borrow this.
> > worry/make worried > anger/make angered > cool/make cold > bleed/make bleed > vomit/make vomit > sleep/put to sleep > put to sleep (because you are boring)/put to > sleep (actively hypnotize) > etc. > > > Voluntary actions are marked with a rising tone > and > > the prefix a- /?&/- > > > > Involuntary actions are marked with a falling tone > and > > the prefix i- /?I/- > > Do I detect a sense of hierarchy expressed by rising > and falling tone? The > Teonim, little elitests and warriors that they are, > definitely privilege the > agents over the experiencers. This attitude is > challenged, though, in some > contemplative practices where the experiencer is > superior to the agent, the > visionary superior to the false prophet.
Er, I don't have any sort of conculture yet, which has caused many problems creating vocabulary.
> > > The tone is marked on the root, not the prefixes. > > > > EX1: > > > > I died (recently) (involuntarily) > > Who's speaking?? Ghosts cannot use volitional verbs > in Teonaht, nor can the > Deity use non-volitional verbs, although the writers > cheat by combining the > non-volitional subject with a volitional verb. This > is necessary to > maintain semantic coherence in story-telling and > religious instruction.
It was just an example. I hadn't anything in particular in mind except expressing volition. -The Sock _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com