Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Anth Assignment Conorthography

From:Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...>
Date:Tuesday, April 18, 2000, 12:58
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:25:50 -0700 Barry Garcia
<Barry_Garcia@...> writes:
> Wow, sounds fun! I've been pondering doing something like that, but > the > idea just overwhelms me. It's too bad there isn't an anthropology > course > at my school like the one at yours. Oh well, I guess i'll have to > settle > for the Spanish grammar course I want to take next semester.
. Well, this is the only "fun" assignment we've gotten. The professor teaching the course gives entertaining lectures, although he's very marxist (he's even in one of our textbooks as an example of marxist archeology) so it gets on some people's nerves (including me and most of the people i know in the class) that almost everything always gets explained in a very marxist, "elites are exploiting the common people" kind of way. And, like i said to someone else's message, they're almost certainly not looking for a detailed in-depth conlang behind the orthography, although i wouldn't know any other way of doing it :-) . My TA said that they're looking for it to be "elegant" and not overly complicated.....but hey, you've got to be naturalistic, eh?
> Very cool idea to link it to your conlang and conculture. I hope we > all > get to see the end result. Will the look of it be more Egyptian or > more Cuneiform?
. Well, i'm not going to be writing it with a stylus on a clay tablet, so not really cuneiform (although that would be cool) so it'll be coming out in more of an Egyptian or Chinese style. I figured out more exactly the Rokbeigalmki history of wordsign orthographic systems: There were two different clans which had members who tried to invent writing systems. One of them started out trying to make it logographic, and the other started out trying the alphabetic way. One day, members of the clans met and realized that they were trying to do the same thing, and the wordsigners switched over to the alphabetic system-in-development and took some of their wordsigns with them. So, for instance, the letters for the single-vowel affixes were originally symbols for the affixes themselves, before being taken to signify the sound and not the meaning. -Stephen (Steg) "do not fear night-terror, nor the arrow that flies by day."