> Hi!
>
> Jim Henry writes:
> > A while ago there was a thread about using phonologically
> > redundant vocabulary (no minimal pairs). I've been working
> > (intermittently) on methods and scripts to generate lists
> > of such words. I started writing something which turned
> > out to be a bit long for a listgroup post, so here it is as
> > an article on my website:
> >
> >
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang/redundancy.htm
> >...
>
> Nice stuff. :-)
>
> At the time of the thread, I was also thinking of a engelang with a
> self-regregating morphology plus redundant word building. These
> are nice tools for implementing a beast like that.