Re: Phonologically redundant vocabulary
|From:||Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, April 13, 2006, 15:32|
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:37:11 +0200, Henrik Theiling wrote:
A language with *error correction* would be funky. This could be something
to explore in X-4 ... any ideas?
> Jim Henry writes:
> > A while ago there was a thread about using phonologically
> > redundant vocabulary (no minimal pairs). I've been working
> > (intermittently) on methods and scripts to generate lists
> > of such words. I started writing something which turned
> > out to be a bit long for a listgroup post, so here it is as
> > an article on my website:
> > http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang/redundancy.htm
> Nice stuff. :-)
> At the time of the thread, I was also thinking of a engelang with a
> self-regregating morphology plus redundant word building. These
> are nice tools for implementing a beast like that.
> Thanks for sharing!
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf