On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:32:39 -0500, Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> wrote:
(Cristophe Grandsire)
>> Still, you could try and keep puritanity for the conjugations :)))
(imagine:
>> keeping the old Latin future forms :) ).
Hehe. That made me laugh. No, I was thinking of ways to avoid the "cras
amabo et regem" discrepancy. How the hell did they end up with that? And
how could a language support that many uncomposed conjugations?!? (Answer:
it couldn't! ;)
>And the passives! So boring the way that every Romance lang abandoned
>the passive.
Wholeheartedly agree. I love the passives. They're high on the list of
things I wanted to keep in Thylean. I'm thinking of making them more
strictly middle voice though.
Óskar