Re: Ethymologies
From: | Dan Jones <devobratus@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 20, 2003, 18:10 |
Ysgrifenodd Yitzik Neidr:
>Shalom!
>
>A question for those who work upon a posteriori languages. Do you make
>ethymologies and proto-forms for your words public, or prefer to keep them
>in your private notes, demonstrating only the final product?
This depends. For Aredos (based on PIE), I generally give the odd etymology
or natlang cognate where I feel it might be interesting. Arvorec derives
from Gaulish, again I occasionally give an etymon, especially if borrowed
from another IB language. But for my few completely a posteriori languages
(such as Dweinasen, Kansu *used* to be a priori but seems now to be a
rather warped descendent of Sumerian) I don't bother giving etymologies. Of
course, if I ever get round to publishing any of the lexicons I've built up
they will contain etymologies.
Dan
--------------------------------
Pa vezer o vageal e bae Douarnenez e klever a-wechoù un trouz iskis:
Kleier kêr Is a zo a seniñ dinandan ar mor.