Re: Re : Reduplication (was: Re: Re : Re: Conculturish question)
| From: | Boudewijn Rempt <bsarempt@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 17:06 |
|---|
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Matt Pearson wrote:
<...>
>
> Things get kind of complicated when you consider examples with
> syllable-final consonants, but that's the basic pattern. Neat, eh?
>
Very much so! I wish I had know about this when doing the Denden
nominal reduplication pattern - now it's mostly a matter of syllable
counting. Still, there's the verbal reduplication which is largely
uncharted territory. Could be possible to fit something like this
in there...
Boudewijn Rempt | http://denden.conlang.org/~bsarempt